Conflict and Solutions

Genesis 13: 8-15 – Abraham’s Solution – the separation

Leon Kass – why midrash? To fill in the gaps! To keep it fresh through 100s of generations.

Abraham was always the ‘stranger’ ( Peter Pitzele)

Avram stays in Canaan Lot goes to Sodom

Avram tries to make peace.

They are “ahim” brothers/kin – how does the relationship effect their attitude and the attitude of the community?

When did Lot “go wrong”? When he acquired wealth.

Rashi says that the text implies that Avram and Lot ‘looked alike’ -
Eli Munk says on this that the lesson is not to think that because they look alike that they are alike.

Lot’s nature is based on greed – thus he went to the place that “looked” good from where he was.

Avram’s tone in suggesting separation is most respectful and peaceful.
Eli Munk points how the word for ‘separate’ indicates a definitive separation which implies a complete break including forbidden intermarriage in the future.
SR Hirsch – this is to protect Avram’s people from the bad influence of Lot’s way of life.
Rashi – looking forward in the story to Sodom & Gomorra – interprets it differently – Abraham will always be there to help Lot.
Nachum Sarna – Abraham shows nobility of character here (to make up for the last chapter) he doesn’t insist on his seniority.

Directions: Left Right = North South

E Munk – there is inference of sexual desire – Lot is driven by sensuality – which is confirmed later.

Lot sees the Planes of Jordon – using the word ‘kikar’ = same as a bar of gold
The sin of Sodom is greed and selfishness.

v11 – parenthetical statement – before the destruction of Sodom & Gemorra - it was beautiful and lush prior to this.

A parallel to Eden – while it looks good there is a serpent buried below.

Lot’s choice is based on his self interest. He doesn’t consult with anyone else.

A word confusion: “Journeyed Eastward” vs. “from the East” to figure out next week.

Books & Articles Mentioned:
I Only Say This Because I Love You, Deborah Tannen